Wednesday, February 20, 2019

Ordinary Photos with a Horrifying/Amazing Context

Sometimes people take a picture that tells an amazing story, it wins awards and thousands of people across the world will see it. Other times a picture appears to be an ordinary picture but when you hear the context behind the picture, it will blow your mind.


1. That little box that this man is holding is the nuclear core to Fat Man- the bomb that destroyed Nagasaki.




2. This photo, of what looks like an ordinary ship at an ordinary dock on an ordinary day. It’s April 16, 1947, and that ship is SS Grandcamp. There is a fire in the hold, and the men on the dock are members of the Texas City Volunteer Fire Department, who are attempting to extinguish it.

SS Grandcamp’s cargo includes 2,200 tons of ammonium nitrate.

A few minutes after this photo was taken, it’s going to detonate in one of the largest non-nuclear explosions in human history, creating a mushroom cloud more than 2,000 feet tall. All but one of the firefighters in that photo are going to be instantly killed, and no identifiable fragment of most of their bodies will ever be recovered. Nearly a thousand buildings in Texas City are going to be flattened, and windows will be broken and pedestrians knocked over by the force of the blast ten miles away in Galveston. Steel shrapnel will be flung out at hypersonic speeds and fall from the sky in molten chunks, igniting secondary fires all over the surrounding area, including the various storage tanks of the local Monsanto chemical refinery and another ship in the harbor, High Flyer, whose own 1,000 tons of ammonium nitrate will detonate in turn.


At least 468 confirmed dead, more than 5,000 injured, and more than $100 million in property damage (in 1947 dollars - over a billion in today’s money).




3. Last photo of Indian Prime Minister Rajiv Gandhi. Taken moments before a suicide bomber, (wearing orange flowers, lower left, also on the inset, top left) hugged him and detonated her bomb.


 



4. The person in this picture is named Tyler Hadley. He brutally beat his parents to death with a hammer. This picture was taken at a party he threw while his parent's bodies were still in the house. 


The guy who called the police is actually the guy standing right next to him in this photo. Earlier that night, Tyler had confessed to him about the murders. It really makes the photo a whole lot stranger considering that the guy next to Tyler is probably thinking about calling the cops, or already had.






5. Tragedy by the Sea...Photo taken of a couple who just watched their 19 month old son get carried away by the ocean waves. The child’s body was found later that day a mile away.






6. The National Geographic Picture from 1987 is of the FIRST heart transplant in Poland. It took 23 hours. The man holding the picture was the patient. He outlived the doctor who performed the surgery.


The surgeon, Dr. Religa, is monitoring the patient's vitals after the transplant while his assistant (the man in the top right corner) is asleep on the floor from exhaustion. These guys were pioneers and medical heroes. The original National Geographic picture from 1987 was voted picture of the year.



7. This photo shows two brothers with their hair standing up in the air like static. They were struck by lightning shortly after. Miraculously, they both survived.

























 


8. This picture of a happy little girl with her brand new bike on Christmas morning 1996. It looks so normal and sweet. She had no idea that later that night, she’d be brutally murdered right in that very house and would become the center of one of the most infamous unsolved mysteries of all time.





9. This photo of a Victorian girl with her parents. You’ll notice how crisp and focused the girl is, whereas her parents are slightly fuzzy from motion blur. This contrast makes the girl stand out and seem a bit more vibrant and present for the photograph.



This is an example of Victorian post-mortem photography. The young woman is captured in such sharp focus because she was dead and therefore completely still, whereas the parents’ slight movements make them appear somewhat blurry.



10. The car to the right would explode minutes later killing 29 people including a woman pregnant with twins. The Omagh bombing in Northern Ireland the worst acts committed during "The Troubles"





11. Two of the kids with the finger guns in the top left are the Columbine shooters.


 


12. This extremely mundane and uninteresting image is of Japan Airlines Flight 123, where after a mechanical error out back had caused it to blow off most of the vertical stabilizer. Only minutes later it would crash, killing the majority of passengers on board and making it the deadliest single plane accident in Aviation history.






13. This photo was the most expensive sold photograph ever (until 2014), selling at $4.3 million.




14. John Lennon signing an autograph for Mark David Chapman just hours before Chapman killed him. According to Chapman, he actually had the gun in his pocket when this photo was taken.

 
 15. This picture is actually taken at 3am, in the middle of the night. That is not the sun on the horizon, the lightning is so bright, it turned night into day.






16. A young American woman soaks in Adolf Hitler’s bathtub, her muddy boots staining his bath mat, and an official portrait of the Fuehrer sits on the tub’s edge.



The woman is Lee Miller, the only female combat photographer in Europe during World War Two. She is pictured in Hitler’s Munich apartment on April 30, 1945, by fellow war correspondent David Scherman.

“This was actually taken on the day that Hitler committed suicide, although Lee Miller didn’t know that until after the event,” said Hilary Roberts, research curator of photography at the museum, who put together the show.










 

Tuesday, February 19, 2019

‘Casa De Carne’: A Short Film That Explores A Restaurant Where Customers Have To Kill Their Own Food



Casa de Carne’ – a film about hard choices and hidden truths. It was produced by the non-profit organization Last Chance for Animals (LCA). Set in a not-so-distant and dark future, three friends must slaughter the animals they order for dinner at a high-end restaurant. 

It won first place at the 2019 Animal Film Festival.
More info: dustintoddfilms.com











Wednesday, February 6, 2019

The Top 5 Vaccination Alternatives



With the recent outbreak of measles, it's important to know how to protect your kids in the event you don't want to vaccinate.


Here are the top 5 alternatives to vaccination:

1. Death


2. Death


If you get the message, I highly recommend you check out the book 



3. Death



4. Death



5. Measles, which could result in death.




6. Bonus Alternative: Smallpox, most likely will result in death




In short THERE ARE NO ALTERNATIVES TO VACCINATIONS


Because women without a job or scientific degree on the internet know more than the entire medical community...and essentials oils are a pyramid scheme.


Thursday, December 13, 2018

Wrong Number - We Don't Sell Pizza Here!



With cell phones, this is becoming less common. Although, we've all done it at some point in our lives, called the wrong number. Almost all of the time people are understanding and we apologize and go on with our day. However, some people are unlucky and have a number one digit off from a number which is frequently called, such as a Pizza restaurant with delivery.




Here is a story about how one family caused a lot of problems for a pizza joint because they got tired of all the wrong numbers. 

"Strap in boys/girls this ones a doozy: We don't sell pizza, because you have the wrong number.


The end result of this story, which I will tell you upfront, is that we lost the ability to order from several local Pizza-Huts ...for lyfe...
Used to we had a phone number that was very similar to a Pizza-Hut, their number was (555)455-5575 and ours was (555)455-5515. Now these two numbers are commonly mixed up for obvious reasons. This was back before the days of cellphones and everyone having their own personal number, and we actually had to get a caller ID because of this.
For years we had this Pizza-Huts client base call our house (about 50/50 split sober/drunk) and order pizzas. The thing is people WILL NOT LISTEN when you tell them "Sorry wrong number" we would have drunk people call back 4-5 times and then begin screaming into the phone "I KNOW THIS IS A FUCKING PIZZAHUT YOU ASSHOLE!" or "GIVE ME THE NUMBER OR I'LL KICK YOUR ASS."


This was pretty normal and the pizza hut was even aware of this and profusely apologized when we would call them. (Never giving us anything for free though, despite the massive inconvenience of the phone ringing off the hook.)
Well Pizza Hut Corporate then pays for an advertisement on paper, bill-board, and phone book. And guess what? They botched the number they put OUR number on the things for the phone number as one of the locations in our town for Pizza Huts pizza. Why? Because 1's and 7's are the same number apparently.
The phone calls we get FUCKING EXPLODES. It goes from like 3-5 phone calls a day to like 100-200. Initially we were directing people with a message that simply said "THIS IS NOT PIZZA HUT! THEIR NUMBER IS XXXXXXXX" It didn't end. We would get calls with people screaming into the voice recording "I WANT A FUCKING PIZZA THIS IS BULLSHIT I'M GOING TO KILL WHOEVER DOESN'T ANSWER THIS FUCKING PHONE!" (Aren't boomers great? We got that shit all the time from older people.) I cannot tell you how many times I've been told to kill myself for trying to direct someone to the correct place, and for some FUCKING reason no one EVER listens.
Well upon this happening my Dad calls into the pizza hut and says "look, all we want is to not have to change our number. If you guys will PLEASE change yours, or pay for ours to be changed (it was like a 10 dollar convince fee or some shit.) we will stop getting your damned phone calls." The manager cussed my Dad, who had him on speaker phone, calling him shit load of names and for "getting him bad reviews" as well as losing customers to his branch, which is locally owned. What a fucking joke. Its costing their business a solid 10 grand EASY over a phone number why not JUST CHANGE IT? IDK.
My Dad looks at the phone, hangs up and says "Ok asshole, you want to be like that about it?"
My dad then instructs My 17 year old self (and my sister) to take all calls from now on. If it rings pick it up, take the order, and say "Ok your pizza should be there in (1.5 hours)" Then when they call back to tell them "Sorry the driver just left." and if they call back a third time say "Well I can get you on the phone with my manager but hes probably going to kick your ass if you keep complaining." And then switch the phone with someone else and have them say "Listen here bitch, you aren't getting your pizza and we are keeping your money, fucking get over it."
Or something along those lines anyway.
Two weeks pass and my Dad tries to get said Pizza Hut to change our number for free. Never pointing out that they fucked up their ad, as apparently they were completely oblivious to this fact. Again the manager screams at my Dad saying "I don't have the money to change your fucking number!" We even tried calling OTHER pizza huts to get the issue resolved, and their corporate with no real luck. Fair enough, its game on time now bitch why? For two reasons 1. My dad got a phone with a transfer button and 2. Because summer was rolling around, and me and my sister loved fucking with people over this. It was a really bad influence on us tbh.
We fielded phone calls every day all day long, we had friends come over and they loved partaking in the same thing. We had a general plan:
  1. Every other call would get a pizza "delivery"
  2. On the other calls we would get them really pissed off talking shit to them and saying "Ok do you want to speak with my manager?" And just cold transfer them to the pizza hut.
It took 6 more weeks of us doing this, and the pizza hut closed. A few weeks before they closed we got a phone call from pizza hut corporate who more or less threatened us with a cease and desist sounded like they didn't really understand what was actually happening as it accused us of "stealing their phone calls." LMFAO. We called their corporate and explained what was going on, and even played our recordings of talking with them before about the issue and ignoring us. All they said is "You had better stop! This is ILLEGAL!" over and over. We didn't stop. They were aware of what was going on and didn't want to do anything about it because to fix their FUBAR.
A few weeks after the owner lost his job he called our house and was trying to argue with my Dad about how "bad of a person he was because I lost money, and got my ass beat several times." ...apparently we had pissed a few people off so bad they actually went in and attacked him and other staff... To this day it cracks me up that a company can be so oblivious, and is the single reason I don't believe we live in anything close to a "Meritocracy" anyone in this position who has any merit would instantly change the number, but not a corporation who has money to sue, and not a middle manager who has an ego problem."

posted by u/MundaneSeesaw


.

Monday, December 10, 2018

Baby It's Cold Outside, Is NOT a Song About Rape


This song has been the center of controversy for the past few years around Christmas time. It is a duet written by Frank Loesser in 1944. The song is famous for it's appearance in the 1949 movie Neptune's Daughter. 


This year, the song has been frozen out because of political correctness outrage due to an ignorance of what the lyrics actually meant at the time of the recording. 

"This #MeToo-era-cum-yuletide-season, radio stations are pulling the plug on that holiday earworm with lyrics that, to some, ring date-rape warning bells, rather than evoking innocent snow-bound flirtation."


A feminist defense of the lyrics points out that when they were written a woman with a good reputation had to protest a man's advances, even if she actually welcomed them, and the song's figurative woman is actually expressing her sexuality in a veiled era-appropriate way:

"
"It’s time to bring an end to the Rape Anthem Masquerading As Christmas Carol"
Hi there! Former English nerd/teacher here. Also a big fan of jazz of the 30s and 40s. 
So. Here’s the thing. Given a cursory glance and applying today’s worldview to the song, yes, you’re right, it absolutely *sounds* like a rape anthem. 
BUT! Let’s look closer! 
“Hey what’s in this drink” was a stock joke at the time, and the punchline was invariably that there’s actually pretty much nothing in the drink, not even a significant amount of alcohol.
See, this woman is staying late, unchaperoned, at a dude’s house. In the 1940’s, that’s the kind of thing Good Girls aren’t supposed to do — and she wants people to think she’s a good girl. The woman in the song says outright, multiple times, that what other people will think of her staying is what she’s really concerned about: “the neighbors might think,” “my maiden aunt’s mind is vicious,” “there’s bound to be talk tomorrow.” But she’s having a really good time, and she wants to stay, and so she is excusing her uncharacteristically bold behavior (either to the guy or to herself) by blaming it on the drink — unaware that the drink is actually really weak, maybe not even alcoholic at all. That’s the joke. That is the standard joke that’s going on when a woman in media from the early-to-mid 20th century says “hey, what’s in this drink?” It is not a joke about how she’s drunk and about to be raped. It’s a joke about how she’s perfectly sober and about to have awesome consensual sex and use the drink for plausible deniability because she’s living in a society where women aren’t supposed to have sexual agency.
Basically, the song only makes sense in the context of a society in which women are expected to reject men’s advances whether they actually want to or not, and therefore it’s normal and expected for a lady’s gentleman companion to pressure her despite her protests, because he knows she would have to say that whether or not she meant it, and if she really wants to stay she won’t be able to justify doing so unless he offers her an excuse other than “I’m staying because I want to.” (That’s the main theme of the man’s lines in the song, suggesting excuses she can use when people ask later why she spent the night at his house: it was so cold out, there were no cabs available, he simply insisted because he was concerned about my safety in such awful weather, it was perfectly innocent and definitely not about sex at all!) In this particular case, he’s pretty clearly right, because the woman has a voice, and she’s using it to give all the culturally-understood signals that she actually does want to stay but can’t say so. She states explicitly that she’s resisting because she’s supposed to, not because she wants to: “I ought to say no no no…” She states explicitly that she’s just putting up a token resistance so she’ll be able to claim later that she did what’s expected of a decent woman in this situation: “at least I’m gonna say that I tried.” And at the end of the song they’re singing together, in harmony, because they’re both on the same page and they have been all along.
So it’s not actually a song about rape - in fact it’s a song about a woman finding a way to exercise sexual agency in a patriarchal society designed to stop her from doing so. But it’s also, at the same time, one of the best illustrations of rape culture that pop culture has ever produced. It’s a song about a society where women aren’t allowed to say yes…which happens to mean it’s also a society where women don’t have a clear and unambiguous way to say no."
 

 
This, taking things out of context and trying to have them banned or get people fired needs to stop.